Corona research puts the pregnant women and their babies at risk due to the lag, found by ProPublica.
ProPublica is a newsroom that investigates the misuse and abuse of power and authority and you can get to know about the story on their official site where you will be notified as soon as they publish something related to that.
The centers for Disease Control and prevention lighted upon a question of critical concern to millions of American women and families which was about how dangerous is the Coronavirus for new mothers and pregnant women?. This topic was kept avoided for 3 months and got in the light in the late of June.
CDC kept asserting that pregnant women aren’t at a higher risk for severe complications for the coronavirus. In late May, a spokesperson told ProPublica that current evidence showing that pregnant women have the same risk as to the adults who are not pregnant.
In the first examination of the Covid-19 on pregnancy, CDC found that expectant mothers have 50% higher chances of getting admitted to proper care have 70% chances of being intubated than the non-pregnant women in the early stages of childbearing.
Researchers also reported that pregnant Latine and black women infected at a higher rate than white women. 30 expectant women died with the virus on the 2nd of July. This news put everyone in worry.
CDC also found that the information about three-quarter pregnant women with coronavirus was missing. United States women of productive age who found Covid-19 positive was 326000 and there was no information about the pregnancy.
It was hard for researchers to find the exact number of pregnant women who were hospitalized. It is found that 31.5% of the pregnant women were hospitalized because of coronavirus but some of them were there for some other reasons but the exact date is still not known.
The OB-GYN providers and researchers in the U.S. have been fattering since the beginning of the COVID and this was highlighted by the flawed CDC reported. The rapid communication providers were trying to keep their patients safe and secure as this virus is hazardous especially for pregnant women and their babies.
US public health system tries to understand the impact of coronavirus in mothers and their babies that have been slow. Cindy M.P. Duke, an OB-GYN runs the Nevada Fertility Institute said that “It is shocking to realize that we do not have a uniform system in place” for analyzing the health information of infants and maternal during the Covid-19 crisis.
Cristina Han who is a maternal-fetal specialist of the University of California said that “By the time we get the best data, this coronavirus pandemic will be over.”
The CDC instructing the local health departments to check a box on the standard case report form to track the coronavirus in maternal and infant. According to the CDC study, it has initiated Covid-19 pregnant surveillance and working with local health departments to improve data collection.
Denise Jamieson who spend 20 years in CDC, said “we need to set up prior to an outbreak to capture information about how pathogen affects pregnant women and their infants. The National Institute for Health research issued a call for studies to be in 2011 to stay running if any other outbreak hits after the H1N1 outbreak in which they were unprepared in 2009.
Marian Knight who is a professor of maternal-infant health at the University of Oxford, said she was told to activate it and by Monday, they were collecting the data.
A comprehensive study of infected coronavirus infected pregnant women at the National health service hospitals and it was based on a two-page electronic platform where the information about all the patients was kept anonymous. “Minimizing the risk of publication of, at best, misleading or, at worst, erroneous, information that has believed other Coronavirus studies”, wrote by Knight in a blog post for BMJ.
UKOSS released it first findings through an analysis of all the pregnant women that were hospitalized in Britain and tested Covid-19 infected, 427 in total. The same fact is found that black women were more in number than white women who were hospitalized and about 1 of 10 women required respiratory support.
This study provided a high quality as well as quite useful data to the doctors and policymakers who need them the most. The British medical organizations quickly issued a new set of guidance about the risk of this outbreak for women of color.
Medical groups also recommended earlier that women should not be involved in jobs such as nurse or medic in the third trimester as it has a huge risk of being in the contact of any virus. They must avoid such jobs in that period of time.
UKOSS findings support the social distancing in the late of the pregnancy because that’s where women are seen with the critical disease, said, Knight. Such things need to be followed religiously to save lives.
4 million births occur yearly in the US which is 5 times Britain and by estimation, more than 16000 women could be infected by coronavirus this year when they give birth. UK has a universal health care system that helps them in obtaining the data of the patients thoroughly whereas, in the case of the US, the healthcare system is inefficient and hidden.
Ultimately it is concluded that in the case of maternal the UK is more concerned and takes the deaths like a public health disaster where the US barely tracks the case.
At the starting of the year, the cases of the corona were limited from China but there was a deluge of studies seeking to fill up the information void about the coronavirus and pregnancy. The coronavirus can make the women very sick and weak but some seem to remail very mildly ill. In some cases, the mother passing the virus to the babies through the womb, and in some cases, they both are like fine.
Some women developed the problems related to heart, indications of placental abnormalities, and reports of asymptomatic women spiraled after giving birth. The data in many of these cases were chaotic because of the findings that might not be proper. The results are thus impossible to interpret, said Knight.
Numerous efforts are going on that could be providing better studies regarding the effect of viruses on pregnant women and babies in the different parts of the US. The national institute of child health and development announced a series of studies at the 12 academic institutes in its maternal-fetal medicine unit networks.
An enormous study will be comparing the women who delivered in these hospitals between March and December and the women of the same months of 2019. This comparison will be showing the number of the deaths that occurred. Another study will be done on the other 1500 women who were pregnant and found Covid-19 positive for a better comparison and conclusion.
The University of California approached a different study the “Priority”. This idea is all about building a registry of the women who found Covid-19 positive and follow them for at least 1 year after they give birth, miscarry, or abortion. The goal of this study to make things more clear geographically, racially, and economically because we want the result to accurately reflect the representation of pregnant women who are being impacted by coronavirus disease, said Vanessa Jacoby, and associate professor at UCSF.
The women who enrolled were pregnant health care workers for this study. Another UCSF based study will select 10000 participants for the study who will be focusing on early pregnancy stages where the risk is highest for birth defects and miscarriage. This study is new to human and that’s why we keep learning more and more about its manifestation in real time, said Bianchi.
The unexpected of Covid-19 is like a life-threatening inflammatory syndrome in children and this is found in recent reports. The Facebook group of OB-GYN’s doctors that consists of 4400 members trading the stories regarding the increment in miscarriage in some of their practices, but it was still not known whether this spike increased because of Covid-19 or something else.
Another OB-GYN member Jane Van Dis said that the gap is knowledge-it’s chilling. Along with that, she also showed some concern regarding this pandemic effects on pregnant women.
The virus keeps surprising us, said Sonja Rasmussen who is the former director of the CDC Office of Infectious disease. She also said that one can’t be so confident in the early of an outbreak as the same had gone with Zika and Ebola. This shows how important collecting the data is but it can’t be assured that the same thing will be happening that is desired before the collection of the data. This needs to be knotted.